Cancer Waiting Times standards
CWT ยท 28-day FDS ยท 31-day decision-to-treat ยท 62-day referral-to-treatment
UK NHSE Cancer Waiting Times standards define maximum permitted intervals from suspected-cancer referral through to first definitive treatment. The 2023 reform consolidated previously complex multi-target standards into three core standards: the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS), the 31-day decision-to-treat-to-first-treatment standard, and the 62-day suspected-cancer-referral-to-treatment standard. Compliance is publicly reported and underpins service performance.
Current standards (NHSE 2023 reform)
| Standard | From | To | Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28-day FDS (Faster Diagnosis Standard) | Suspected-cancer referral (or breast symptomatic / screening referral) | Communication to patient of diagnosis or rule-out | โฅ75% |
| 31-day standard | Decision to treat (DTT) | First definitive treatment | โฅ96% |
| 62-day standard | Suspected-cancer referral (2WW / cancer screening / consultant upgrade) | First definitive treatment | โฅ85% |
NHS Long-Term Plan: aspirational 75% of cancers diagnosed at stage 1-2 by 2028.
Application to skin cancer
- 2-week wait (2WW) referral: NICE NG12 โ suspected skin cancer triggers (pigmented lesion 7-point checklist, non-pigmented lesion with concerning features). Required to be seen within 14 days from GP receipt.
- 28-day FDS: patient must receive communication of diagnosis or exclusion within 28 days of referral.
- 31-day standard: where treatment is needed (e.g. WLE for melanoma, Mohs for cSCC), this should occur within 31 days of MDT decision.
- 62-day standard: end-to-end pathway from suspected-cancer referral to first definitive treatment within 62 days.
- Surgical first definitive treatment: WLE / Mohs / lymphadenectomy.
- Non-surgical first definitive treatment: radiotherapy, immunotherapy initiation (e.g. pembrolizumab Cycle 1, T-VEC, vismodegib), active surveillance start (not usually counted).
- Topical 5-FU / imiquimod / cryotherapy can count as first definitive treatment in low-risk situations.
Breach analysis and reasons
- Common reasons for breach:
- Diagnostic delays (biopsy backlog, complex histology, MDT clarification).
- Patient factors (DNAs, comorbidity workup, patient choice to delay).
- Surgical capacity issues.
- Imaging / staging delays.
- Inter-provider transfer.
- Genetic / specialist referral delays.
- Tracking: cancer trackers, MDT coordinators, weekly performance reports.
- Reporting: trust-level NHS England CWT submissions monthly; published quarterly.
- Patient-initiated pauses: clock pauses for patient choice / comorbidity but not for provider delay.
- Inter-provider transfer: 38-day rule โ handover by day 38 of pathway minimises 62-day breach risk for receiving SSMDT.
Practical points
- Document GP-referral date and patient-pathway clock-start date on every consultation.
- For SSMDT receiving inter-provider transfers, ensure pathology slides / digital images and MDT minutes arrive simultaneously to enable rapid discussion.
- Real-time data submission to COSD / NCRAS supports both audit and CWT reporting.
- If a patient is unsuitable for definitive treatment within timeframe (frailty, comorbidity workup), document MDT decision and patient choice; treats clock-pause appropriately.
- Counsel patient on expected timelines at first consultation.
- Local trust cancer-manager / coordinator is the central point for tracking โ engage early on suspected breaches.
References
- NHS England. Cancer Waiting Times: clinical guide and definitions. London: NHSE; 2023.
- NICE NG12. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. London: NICE; 2015 (last updated 15 April 2026).
- NHS England. Cancer waiting times standards and monthly statistics. London: NHS England; accessed 18 May 2026.
- NHS England. The NHS Long Term Plan. London: NHS England; 2019.
- NICE NG14. Melanoma: assessment and management. London: NICE; 2015 (last updated 27 July 2022).
Spot a correction?
If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.

