Neutrophilic dermatosisParaneoplasticICD-10 L88

Pyoderma gangrenosum

PG; phagedenic ulcer; neutrophilic dermatosis with pathergy

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterised by rapidly progressive, painful, necrotising skin ulcers with violaceous undermined borders. Diagnosis is one of exclusion β€” supported by the Maverakis 2018 Delphi consensus criteria, the separate PARACELSUS point-based score (JockenhΓΆfer 2019) and the older Su 2004 criteria. PG demonstrates the pathergy phenomenon (worsening after surgical trauma), which makes it a major trap in skin-oncology and reconstructive practice: what looks like wound dehiscence or necrotising soft-tissue infection after an excision may be PG, and further debridement worsens the disease. Strong associations exist with inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn, ulcerative colitis), rheumatoid arthritis, monoclonal IgA gammopathy and haematological malignancy (AML, MDS, CMML) β€” the last group represents paraneoplastic PG. Treatment is high-dose immunosuppression, NOT surgical debridement.

CurrentLast reviewed 15 May 2026
Clinical image of Pyoderma gangrenosum
Pyoderma gangrenosum. Image sourced from DermNet New Zealand. Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. No endorsement implied.

Clinical features and variants

  • Rapidly enlarging painful ulcer with a violaceous undermined border and necrotic base; surrounding erythema.
  • Pathergy β€” new lesions or worsening of existing lesions after surgical / minor trauma (positive in ~ 25–50%).
  • Four clinical variants:
    • Classic (ulcerative) β€” pretibial; deep painful ulcer; associated with IBD, RA, monoclonal gammopathy.
    • Bullous (atypical) β€” superficial bullae and erosions; dorsal hands, extensor arms, face; strong haematological-malignancy association (AML, MDS, leukaemia cutis differential).
    • Vegetative β€” superficial, less painful, granulomatous; usually no systemic association.
    • Peristomal β€” around stoma sites in IBD; difficult to manage.
  • Pustular PG β€” pustules without ulceration; precedes classic PG in some, particularly IBD.

Pathergy β€” the surgical trap

  • Pathergy β€” worsening or new PG lesions after surgical trauma (biopsy, debridement, surgical excision).
  • Following a clinically-clean WLE, what appears to be post-operative wound infection / dehiscence / necrotising fasciitis may be PG.
  • Critical pitfall: aggressive surgical debridement worsens PG, expands the wound and may cause limb-threatening deterioration.
  • Clues β€” wound expansion out of proportion to surgical defect; violaceous undermined border; severe pain; negative tissue cultures; failure to respond to broad-spectrum antibiotics; rapid onset 24–72 hours post-op.
  • Suspect PG if a non-healing post-operative wound deteriorates without microbiological evidence of infection and is exquisitely painful β€” start oral / IV corticosteroids and refer to dermatology urgently.

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis of exclusion β€” no specific test; histology is supportive but not pathognomonic.
  • Several frameworks exist as distinct instruments:
    • Maverakis 2018 Delphi consensus criteria (JAMA Dermatol) β€” one major criterion (exclusion of relevant differentials) + a combination of minor criteria including rapid progression, pathergy, suggestive history, characteristic clinical features, response to immunosuppression.
    • PARACELSUS score (JockenhΓΆfer 2019, Br J Dermatol) β€” a separate point-based scoring system.
    • Su 2004 criteria β€” the older diagnostic framework.
  • Histology β€” dense neutrophilic infiltrate with overlying ulceration, often with leukocytoclastic vasculitis and necrosis. Biopsy from the edge of the ulcer (not the base) β€” and accept the pathergy risk by combining biopsy with concurrent immunosuppression.
  • Exclude differentials: bacterial / atypical mycobacterial / fungal infection (deep cultures, AFB, fungal), vasculitis (ANCA, complement), BehΓ§et, antiphospholipid syndrome, calciphylaxis, venous / arterial / mixed ulcer, factitious disease.

Systemic associations

  • Inflammatory bowel disease β€” Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis. PG is uncommon among IBD patients overall (about 1–3%, cohort-dependent), but IBD is a common associated condition among people who present with PG.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthropathies.
  • Monoclonal IgA gammopathy β€” particularly with classic ulcerative PG.
  • Haematological malignancy β€” AML, MDS, CMML β€” particularly bullous PG variant. PG can precede the haematological diagnosis by months.
  • Solid tumours (rare) β€” colorectal, breast.
  • Workup β€” FBC + film, U&E, LFT, CRP, immunoglobulins + electrophoresis, ANA, ANCA, IBD screen, haematology if cytopenia or bullous PG.

Treatment

  • Limited disease β€” superpotent topical clobetasol propionate, intralesional triamcinolone, topical tacrolimus.
  • Moderate-severe disease:
    • Oral prednisolone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day, tapered over months.
    • Ciclosporin 3–5 mg/kg/day (steroid-sparing, can be primary therapy).
    • Tumour-necrosis-factor (TNF) inhibitors β€” infliximab or adalimumab; particularly useful for IBD-associated PG, with IBD commissioning routes such as Crohn's disease TA187 / ulcerative colitis TA329 where the underlying bowel indication is met. PG-specific use is otherwise off-label / specialist-commissioned.
    • IL-23 inhibitors (ustekinumab, guselkumab) β€” emerging evidence.
    • Dapsone, sulfasalazine, mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-sparing regimens.
  • Wound care β€” non-adherent dressings, atraumatic, no surgical debridement.
  • Analgesia β€” substantial; opioid often required.
  • Treatment of underlying disease (IBD, RA, haematological) often improves PG control.
  • Multidisciplinary input β€” dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, haematology, tissue viability, plastic surgery (cautiously, only after disease control).

References

  1. Maverakis E et al. Diagnostic criteria of ulcerative pyoderma gangrenosum β€” a Delphi consensus of international experts. JAMA Dermatol; 2018.
  2. Ortega-Loayza AG et al. Pyoderma gangrenosum β€” clinical review. JAMA Dermatol; 2023.
  3. Schmieder SJ et al. Postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum β€” recognition and management. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017.

Spot a correction?

If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.