ProceduralSurgical principlesProcedural concept

Suture material selection

Suture selection ยท closure materials in skin oncology

Closure-material choice is a procedural decision in skin-oncology surgery, balancing strength, longevity, tissue reactivity, knot security, patient factors and cosmesis. Practice varies between surgeons and units. This page sets out principles for choosing a closure strategy by tissue layer, site, tension and wound-healing risk, rather than prescribing a specific suture product or size.

CurrentLast reviewed 16 May 2026

Classification

CategoryGeneral behaviourTissue reactivityTypical role
Absorbable monofilamentLoses strength over time; lower drag through tissueLowBuried dermal / subcuticular support where a removable skin stitch is not desired
Absorbable braidedHandles and knots well; braided structure can increase tissue dragModerateSelected mucosal or buried closure where local practice favours it
Non-absorbable monofilamentRetains tensile strength until removed; low tissue dragLowSkin-edge apposition where planned removal is appropriate
Braided / natural non-absorbable materialEasy handling but greater capillarity and tissue reactionHigherReserved for selected indications according to surgeon preference and local practice

Closure choice by anatomy

SiteClosure prioritiesPractical considerations
Face, eyelid, lip, nosePrecise anatomical alignment, minimal track marks, early scar qualityAvoid tension on the skin edge; align free margins and aesthetic borders meticulously.
ScalpHaemostasis, robust deep support, ease of aftercare through hairLayered support and secure dressing are often more important than the exact skin-closure material.
Trunk / abdomenTension management and scar widening preventionDeep support and alignment with relaxed skin tension lines matter most.
Lower limbTension reduction, oedema control and wound-healing riskConsider staged closure, grafting, compression planning or delayed healing where perfusion is poor.
Hand / footFunction, tendon glide, splinting and avoidance of joint contractureImmobilisation and hand-therapy planning may be more important than the closure material.
Mucosal / anogenitalComfort, moisture, contamination and low foreign-body reactionUse local specialist practice and patient comfort to guide closure choice.

Technique considerations

  • Tension placed on the deep supportive layer; the skin edge should appose, not strangulate.
  • Buried interrupted dermal: knot inverted to lie deep.
  • Subcuticular continuous: cosmetically useful in selected low-tension wounds; removal or absorption depends on material and local practice.
  • Vertical mattress: good wound eversion; reduces step-off; useful on lower legs, dorsal hand.
  • Horizontal mattress: useful for high-tension closure (anterior tibia, scalp).
  • Half-buried horizontal mattress (tip stitch): for flap tips and corner closure where vascularity must be protected.
  • Avoid high-reactivity or capillary materials where infection risk, chronic foreign-body reaction or delayed healing matters.

Practical points

  • Track-mark appearance is minimised by avoiding tension on the skin edge and using timely review / removal where removable skin closure is used.
  • For Mohs reconstruction and staged grafting, closure and fixation should be selected according to defect contour, graft stability and local unit practice.
  • Counsel patient about scar massage from week 2-3; silicone gel from week 4 for 3 months in keloid-prone patients.
  • Document closure method, aftercare and review / removal plan in the operation note.
  • In poor wound-healing sites, prioritise tension reduction, perfusion, oedema control and infection prevention.
  • Tissue adhesives can be useful for selected low-tension closures.

References

  1. Wong WK, Lim YK. Choice of sutures. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37:399-401.
  2. Postlethwait RW. Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg. 1970;171:892-898.
  3. British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. BAPRAS guide to suture material selection. London: BAPRAS; 2020.
  4. Lober CW, Fenske NA. Suture materials for closing the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986;10:245-248.
  5. British Society for Dermatological Surgery. Annual Surgery Workshop Manual. London: BSDS; 2024.

Spot a correction?

If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.