ProceduralSurgical principlesProcedural concept
Suture material selection
Suture selection ยท closure materials in skin oncology
Closure-material choice is a procedural decision in skin-oncology surgery, balancing strength, longevity, tissue reactivity, knot security, patient factors and cosmesis. Practice varies between surgeons and units. This page sets out principles for choosing a closure strategy by tissue layer, site, tension and wound-healing risk, rather than prescribing a specific suture product or size.
CurrentLast reviewed 16 May 2026
Classification
| Category | General behaviour | Tissue reactivity | Typical role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorbable monofilament | Loses strength over time; lower drag through tissue | Low | Buried dermal / subcuticular support where a removable skin stitch is not desired |
| Absorbable braided | Handles and knots well; braided structure can increase tissue drag | Moderate | Selected mucosal or buried closure where local practice favours it |
| Non-absorbable monofilament | Retains tensile strength until removed; low tissue drag | Low | Skin-edge apposition where planned removal is appropriate |
| Braided / natural non-absorbable material | Easy handling but greater capillarity and tissue reaction | Higher | Reserved for selected indications according to surgeon preference and local practice |
Closure choice by anatomy
| Site | Closure priorities | Practical considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Face, eyelid, lip, nose | Precise anatomical alignment, minimal track marks, early scar quality | Avoid tension on the skin edge; align free margins and aesthetic borders meticulously. |
| Scalp | Haemostasis, robust deep support, ease of aftercare through hair | Layered support and secure dressing are often more important than the exact skin-closure material. |
| Trunk / abdomen | Tension management and scar widening prevention | Deep support and alignment with relaxed skin tension lines matter most. |
| Lower limb | Tension reduction, oedema control and wound-healing risk | Consider staged closure, grafting, compression planning or delayed healing where perfusion is poor. |
| Hand / foot | Function, tendon glide, splinting and avoidance of joint contracture | Immobilisation and hand-therapy planning may be more important than the closure material. |
| Mucosal / anogenital | Comfort, moisture, contamination and low foreign-body reaction | Use local specialist practice and patient comfort to guide closure choice. |
Technique considerations
- Tension placed on the deep supportive layer; the skin edge should appose, not strangulate.
- Buried interrupted dermal: knot inverted to lie deep.
- Subcuticular continuous: cosmetically useful in selected low-tension wounds; removal or absorption depends on material and local practice.
- Vertical mattress: good wound eversion; reduces step-off; useful on lower legs, dorsal hand.
- Horizontal mattress: useful for high-tension closure (anterior tibia, scalp).
- Half-buried horizontal mattress (tip stitch): for flap tips and corner closure where vascularity must be protected.
- Avoid high-reactivity or capillary materials where infection risk, chronic foreign-body reaction or delayed healing matters.
Practical points
- Track-mark appearance is minimised by avoiding tension on the skin edge and using timely review / removal where removable skin closure is used.
- For Mohs reconstruction and staged grafting, closure and fixation should be selected according to defect contour, graft stability and local unit practice.
- Counsel patient about scar massage from week 2-3; silicone gel from week 4 for 3 months in keloid-prone patients.
- Document closure method, aftercare and review / removal plan in the operation note.
- In poor wound-healing sites, prioritise tension reduction, perfusion, oedema control and infection prevention.
- Tissue adhesives can be useful for selected low-tension closures.
References
- Wong WK, Lim YK. Choice of sutures. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37:399-401.
- Postlethwait RW. Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg. 1970;171:892-898.
- British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. BAPRAS guide to suture material selection. London: BAPRAS; 2020.
- Lober CW, Fenske NA. Suture materials for closing the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986;10:245-248.
- British Society for Dermatological Surgery. Annual Surgery Workshop Manual. London: BSDS; 2024.
Spot a correction?
If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.

