Wide local excision — principles and margin planning
WLE; wide excision; definitive excision
Wide local excision is the most common procedure in UK skin oncology. The intent is removal of the primary tumour with a clinically defined peripheral margin (and an appropriate deep plane) to minimise local recurrence while preserving function and form. Margins are tumour- and stage-specific — NICE NG14 melanoma margins by stage group, BAD cSCC margins, BAD BCC margins, ESMO-EURACAN MCC margins — and the same procedure is used for sarcoma re-excision once histology is known. Planning the excision before the scalpel touches the skin (marking margins, drawing the closure, photographing the lesion) is the single most consistent driver of clean outcomes.
Melanoma margins (NICE NG14)
- Stage 0 (in situ) — at least 0.5 cm peripheral margin; consider staged excision / Mohs with immunostains or a wider clinical margin for lentigo maligna, head-and-neck disease or large ill-defined lesions.
- Stage I — 1 cm clinical margin. This includes pT1 disease and pT2a disease (1.01–2.0 mm without ulceration).
- Stage II — 2 cm clinical margin. This includes pT2b disease (1.01–2.0 mm with ulceration), pT3 and pT4 disease; 1 cm is reserved for situations where a 2 cm margin would cause unacceptable disfigurement or morbidity.
- Margins are measured clinically from the visible lesion or biopsy scar, perpendicular to the skin, and confirmed histologically. Deep margin to underlying fascia (not through it) for invasive disease.
cSCC margins (BAD 2020)
- Low-risk cSCC — 4 mm peripheral margin.
- High-risk cSCC — 6 mm peripheral margin.
- Very high-risk cSCC (BWH T2b/T3, recurrent, immunosuppressed) — consider 10 mm or Mohs micrographic surgery.
- Deep margin to subcutis ± fascia depending on tumour depth and anatomic site.
BCC margins (BAD 2021)
- Low-risk BCC (well-defined nodular/superficial, < 2 cm, low-risk site) — 4 mm peripheral margin.
- High-risk BCC (morphoeic / infiltrative / micronodular subtype, recurrent, immunosuppressed, H-zone, > 2 cm) — 5 mm minimum; Mohs micrographic surgery preferred where access exists.
- Deep margin to subcutis.
Pre-operative planning
- Photograph the lesion / scar at consent and at planning.
- Mark the visible lesion / scar and the planned margin with a surgical pen with the patient sitting up; check tension and orientation; redraw with the patient supine if needed.
- Plan the closure before incision (primary, advancement, transposition, rotation, graft) — see Reconstruction atlas.
- Local anaesthesia with 1% lidocaine + adrenaline (avoid adrenaline on digits and end-organs).
- Anti-coagulation, aspirin and clopidogrel — discuss patient-specific risk; most skin excisions can continue antiplatelets without significant bleeding risk.
Technique and orientation
- Sharp dermal-edge incision perpendicular to the skin surface — bevelled cuts compromise margin assessment.
- Deep plane chosen by tumour type and anatomy — fascia is generally safe but not always necessary for thin lesions; for melanoma the deep margin is the fascia of the muscle below, included only if invaded.
- Haemostasis with bipolar or fine cautery; avoid charring the specimen edge.
- Orient the specimen with a suture marker only where re-excision of a single involved margin is plausible (e.g. on the face where margin sparing matters) — over-orientation makes pathology harder.
- Closure under no tension — undermining and layered closure according to site, depth and tension.
Specimen handling and margin assessment
- Specimen sent in 10% formalin labelled with patient identifiers, site, orientation if marked, and the tumour type / clinical question.
- Histopathology reports peripheral and deep margin clearance in millimetres and records subtype, depth, ulceration, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion as relevant.
- Incomplete or close margins — MDT discussion; options include re-excision, Mohs (for non-melanoma), adjuvant radiotherapy and active surveillance.
- Re-excise via the original scar to preserve cosmesis and avoid creating new margin disturbance.
References
- NICE NG14. Melanoma: assessment and management. London: NICE; 2015 (last updated 27 July 2022).
- Keohane SG et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 2020. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(3):401-414.
- Nasr I, McGrath EJ, Harwood CA et al. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of adults with basal cell carcinoma 2021. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(5):899-920.
Spot a correction?
If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.

